Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Rawal, Prakhar
- Individual-Level Discrimination in Song Characteristics of White-Rumped Shama, Copsychus malabaricus
Abstract Views :87 |
PDF Views:58
Authors
Affiliations
1 Zoological Survey of India, Northern Regional Centre, Kaulagarh Road, Dehradun 248 195, IN
2 Forest Research Institute, Kaulagarh Road, Dehradun 248 195, IN
3 Department of Biology, University of Turuku, Fl-20014, Turuku, FI
1 Zoological Survey of India, Northern Regional Centre, Kaulagarh Road, Dehradun 248 195, IN
2 Forest Research Institute, Kaulagarh Road, Dehradun 248 195, IN
3 Department of Biology, University of Turuku, Fl-20014, Turuku, FI
Source
Current Science, Vol 125, No 1 (2023), Pagination: 59-65Abstract
Passerines exhibit considerable variations in song characteristics, with crucial ecological, behavioural and conservation implications. We documented the individual variations and level of distinctness in the song characteristics of white-rumped shama, Copsychus malabaricus. Bioacoustic analysis revealed that songs were composed of repeated strophes (2–5 types per individual) with occasional whistles/trills or orphan syllables, made up of 3–13 elements, with dissimilar structures. Data analysis using 373 strophes from 22 males showed that all 8 variables (minimum, maximum, dominant and range of frequency, strophe duration, song rate, number of elements per strophe and type of element per strophe) differed significantly (P < 0.001). Song variations were higher among individuals compared to within individuals. The principal component analysis explained 56.87% variance. Discriminant function analysis exhibited 69.41% cumulative variance with 40.37% classification accuracy. The present study may be useful for further research on some other attributes of a song such as repertoire size, microstructure and seasonal/diurnal variations.Keywords
Bioacoustic Analysis, Copsychus malabaricus, Discriminate Function Analysis, Principal Component Analysis, Song Distinctness.References
- Linhart, P. and Šálek, M., The assessment of biases in the acoustic discrimination of individuals. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12, e0177206; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177206
- Ranjard, L., Withers, S. J., Brunton, D. H., Parsons, S. and Ross, H. A., Geographic patterns of song variation reveal timing of song acquisition in wild avian population. Behav. Ecol., 2017, 28, 1085–1092.
- Thompson, M. J., Pearse, K. A. and Foote, J. R., Seasonal and diel plasticity of song type use in individual ovenbirds (Seiurus aurocapilla). Ethology, 2020, 126, 824–838.
- Chen, G., Xia, C. and Zhang, Y., Individual identification of birds with complex songs: the case of green-backed flycatchers Ficedula elisae. Behav. Process., 2020, 173, 104063.
- Axelrod, R. and Hamilton, W. D., The evolution of cooperation. Science, 1981, 211, 1390–1396.
- Godard, R., Tit for tat among neighbouring hooded warblers. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1993, 33, 45–50.
- Naguib, M., Diehl, J., van Ores, K. and Sniders, L., Repeatability of signalling traits in the avian dawn chorus. Front. Zool., 2019, 16, 1–11.
- Terry, A. M. R., Peake, T. M. and McGregor, P. K., The role of vocal individuality in conservation. Front. Zool., 2005, 2, 10–25; doi:10. 1186/1742-9994-2-10.
- Beecher, M. D., Bird song learning as a social process. Anim. Behav., 2017, 106, 233–246.
- Xia, C., Huang, R., Wei, C., Nie, P. and Zhang, Y., Individual identification on the basis of the songs of the Asian stubtail (Urosphena sqameiceps). Chin. Birds, 2011, 2, 132–139.
- Xia, C., Xiao, H. and Zhang, Y., Individual variation in brownish-flanked bush warbler songs. Condor, 2010, 112, 591–595.
- Rabiner, L. R. and Juang, B. H., An introduction to hidden Markov models. IEEE ASSP Mag., 1986, 3, 4–16.
- Potter, J. R., Mellinger, D. K. and Clark, C. W., Marine mammal call discrimination using artificial neural networks. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1994, 96, 1255–1262.
- Fox, E. J. S., A new perspective on acoustic individual recognition in animals with limited call sharing or changing repertoires. Anim. Behav., 2008, 75, 1187–1194.
- Petrusková, T., Osiejuk, T. S. and Petrusek, A., Geographic variation in songs of the tree pipit (Anthus trivialis) at two spatial scales. Auk, 2010, 127, 274–282.
- Charrier, I., Mathevon, N. and Jouventin P., Individuality in the voice of fur seal females: an analysis study of the pup attraction call in Arctocephalus tropicalis. Mar. Mamm. Sci., 2003, 19, 161–172.
- Li, Y., Xia, C., Lloyd, H., Li, D. and Zhang, Y., Identification of vocal individuality in male cuckoos using different analytical techniques. Avian Res., 2017, 8, 1–7.
- Deng, Z., Lloyd, H., Xia, C., Li, D. and Zhang, Y., Within-season decline in call consistency of individual male common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus). J. Ornithol., 2019, 160, 317–327.
- Aguon, C. F. and Conant, S., Breeding biology of the white-rumped shama on Oahu, Hawaii. Wilson Bull., 1994, 106, 311–328.
- Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D., Handbook of the Birds of India and Pakistan, Robins to Wagtails, Oxford University Press, Bombay, 1973, vol. 9.
- Rasmussen, P. C. and Anderton, J. C., Birds of South Asia. The Ripley Guide. Vol. 1, Smithsonian Institution and Lynx Edicions, Washington DC, USA and Barcelona, Spain, 2005.
- Fan, M.-W., Lin, R. S., Fang, W. and Lin, Y.-H., The distribution and abundance of the alien invasive white-rumped shama (Copsychus malabaricus) in Taiwan. Taiwania, 2009, 54, 248–254.
- Kumar, A., Physical characteristics, categories and functions of song in Indian robin Saxicoloides fulicata (Aves: Muscicapidae). J. Threat. Taxa, 2011, 3, 1909–1918.
- Champion, H. G. and Seth, S. K., A Revised Forest Types of India, Manager of Publications, Delhi, 1968.
- R Core Team, R., A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2020; https://www.R-project.org/.
- Kassambara, A., rstatix: Pipe-friendly framework for basic statistical tests. R package version 0.7.0, 2021; https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix
- Ben-Shachar, M., Lüdecke, D. and Makowski, D., Effect size: estimation of effect size indices and standardized parameters. J. Open Source Softw., 2020, 5, 2815; doi:10.21105/joss.02815.
- Venables, W. N. and Ripley, B. D., Modern Applied Statistics with S, Springer, New York, USA, 2002, 4th edn.
- Wallschlager, D., Correlation of song frequency and body weight in passerine birds. Experientia, 1980, 36, 412.
- Ryan, M. J. and Brenowitz, E. A., The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. Am. Nat., 1985, 126, 87–100.
- Mikula, P. et al., A global analysis of song frequency in passerines provides no support for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis but suggests a role for sexual selection. Ecol. Lett., 2021, 24, 477–486.
- Morton, E. S., Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am. Nat., 1975, 109, 17–34.
- Ey, E. and Fischer, J., The ‘acoustic adaptation hypothesis’ – a review of the evidence from birds, anurans and mammals. Bioacoustics, 2009, 19, 21–48.
- Pearse, W. D., Morales-Castilla, I., James, L. S., Farrell, M., Boivin, F. and Davies, T. J., Global macroevolution and macroecology of passerine song. Evolution, 2018, 72, 944–960.
- Price, J. J., Earnshaw, S. M. and Webster, M. S., Montezuma oropendolas modify a component of song constrained by body size during vocal contests. Anim. Behav., 2006, 71, 799–807.
- Lein, M. R., Song variation in buff-breasted flycatchers (Empidonax fulvifrons). Wilson J. Ornithol., 2008, 120, 256–267.
- Tao, J., Johnson, M. T. and Osiejuk, T. S., Acoustic model adaptation for ortolan bunting (Emberiza hortulana L.) song-type classification. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2008, 123, 1582–1590.
- Foote, J. R., Palazzi, E. and Mennill, D. J., Songs of the Eastern Phoebe, a suboscine songbird, are individually distinctive but do not vary geographically. Bioacoustics, 2013, 22, 137–151.
- Bee, M. A. and Gerhardt, H. C., Individual voice recognition in a territorial frog (Rana catesbeiana). Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 2002, 269, 1443–1448.
- Yovel, Y., Melcon, M. L., Franz, M. O., Denzinger, A. and Schnitzler, H.-U., The voice of bats: how greater mouse-eared bats recognize individuals based on their echolocation calls. PLOS Comput. Biol., 2009, 5, e1000400; doi:org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000400.
- Deoniziak, K. and Osiejuk, T. S., Habitat-related differences in song structure and complexity in a songbird with a large repertoire. BMC Ecol., 2019, 19, 1–11; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-019-0255-7
- Najar, N. and Benedict, L., The relationship between latitude, migration and the evolution of bird song complexity. Ibis, 2019, 161, 1–12.